Description
This slide presentation outlines a comparison of three utilities in Florida in their project delivery methods for obtaining a low-pressure reverse osmosis facility. The utilities included: City of Ormond Beach, City of St. Augustine, and St. Johns County. Presentation topics include: description of projects by utility;descriptions of project delivery methods;perceived advantages of project delivery method; and,perceived disadvantages of project delivery method. Conclusions were that:any project delivery method will work well ifparticipants are willing; Construction-Manager-at-Risk(CMAR) and Engineer-Procurement-Construction Management (EPCM) allow great control of costsand schedules;EPCM provides the most integrated team;CMAR can have conflict with designer if lessthat complete Plans/Specs are used for GMP; and,for “conservative owners”, traditionaldesign-bid-build is the safest option.
Product Details
- Edition:
- Vol. – No.
- Published:
- 03/01/2007
- Number of Pages:
- 17
- File Size:
- 1 file , 590 KB
- Note:
- This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus
